book notes, selections of good writing, and other thoughts

For the love of Mamas at the International Museum of Women

The International Museum of Women has a great exhibition up on mothers around the world, from issues of pregnancy to birth, and more: MAMA: Motherhood Around the Globe. Here’s a screenshot below, but visit the exhibition. It’s very moving.

 

Screen Shot 2013-06-13 at 10.52.41 AM

Understanding the text forwards

…we should stop thinking in terms of compositional processes that culminate in the production of fixed texts. Instead, we should think in terms of what I call traditionary processes that encompass both textual formation and textual interpretation, as well as a variety of text-involving practices, individual and communal. From these traditionary processes, texts of more or less fixity sometimes precipitate out, just as, in chemistry, separable solids sometimes form within a medium that remains liquid. Once we think in terms of traditionary processes, we are free to understand them either backwards or forwards. We may take a retrospective approach, seeking to reconstruct an archetypal text or family of texts, and this is a very valuable pursuit. Or, we may take a prospective approach, studying the interpretive, religious and cultural developments that precede, succeed and intervene in the formation of texts.

-Hindy Najman, “Configuring the Text in Biblical Studies”

The Racial Wealth Gap

HT: Paul Cook. Infographic from Sojourners.

In America we honor the ideal of equality and the myth of equal opportunity, but the secret we refuse to acknowledge is the debilitating, dehumanizing effects of poverty.

Print

Why you should watch even if you don’t care for the Gospel of Thomas

Tomorrow we will host our first live event on the MRB and you can follow this link for the live stream. Mark Goodacre and Simon Gathercole will join us for a discussion of their recent books on the Gospel of Thomas. Even if the Gospel of Thomas is not your cup of tea, you should stop by to see one of the ways Marginalia is working beyond the book review. Click on the link or image above and you can also submit questions in advance.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Romano’s “Battle of the Milvian Bridge”

Giulio Romano, The Battle of the Milvian Bridge

Constantine’s defeat of Maxentius on October 28, 312 at the Milvian Bridge was painted probably by Giulio Romano and others of Raphael’s workshop sometime near the end of the High Renaissance. The fresco is in the Raphael Rooms at the Vatican.

The earliest account of the battle, a Latin panegyric written around 313, was fully human. But only a year later Lactantius wrote a pamphlet introducing the idea of divine involvement: Constantine had a dream in which he was ordered to inscribe a sign on his soldiers’ shields containing a chi-ro, the the first two letters of the name of Christ. The legend grew further from there to involve Constantine seeing a cross in the sky promising him victory. In Romano’s Renaissance account above, sword-bearing angels fly above the battle, directing and securing victory for Constantine. Romano has abandoned Lactantius’s account of the chi-ro on the shield, but he has soldiers carrying crosses into battle.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Alexander the Great’s Great Greatness

My wife and daughter are dual Irish and US citizens, and in Ireland they’d call Plutarch a gobdaw for this.

Alexander the Great on his Steed

Alexander the Great on his Steed (Photo credit: public-sector-lists.com | governmentlists)

Those who were vanquished by Alexander are happier than those who escaped his hand; for these had no one to put an end to the wretchedness of their existence, while the victor compelled those others to lead a happy life…Alexander’s new subjects would not have been civilized, had they not been vanquished; Egypt would not have its Alexandria, nor Mesopotamia its Seleuceia, nor Sogdiana its Prophthasia, nor India its Bucephalia, nor the Caucasus a Greek city hard by; for by the founding of cities in these places savagery was extinguished and the worse element, gaining familiarity with the better, changed under its influence.

-Plutarch, On the Fortunes of Alexander 1.5

The New Grammar of the New Pope

Yesterday we published an opinion piece by Thomas Bolin on MRB. You can read it here. He introduced his piece by referring to the “grammar” of the papacy:

Gesture is the language of the Roman hierarchy, and the “grammar” of the Pope’s first few days has been rich with significance. From the moment he appeared on the central balcony at St. Peter’s, Pope Francis I sounded a new tone of simplicity. He has not worn elaborate vestments. He did not address the College of Cardinals in Latin. He eschewed the papal limousine and motorcade. He rode the elevator with the Cardinals rather than going alone. These moves are consistent with his lifestyle prior to his election. In Buenos Aires, he lived in a small apartment, cooked his own food, and rode mass transit to work.

Today at his first Mass, Pope Francis continued this new grammar, this time in speech:

Certainly, Jesus Christ conferred power upon Peter, but what sort of power was it? Jesus’ three questions to Peter about love are followed by three commands: feed my lambs, feed my sheep. Let us never forget that authentic power is service, and that the Pope too, when exercising power, must enter ever more fully into that service which has its radiant culmination on the Cross. He must be inspired by the lowly, concrete and faithful service which marked Saint Joseph and, like him, he must open his arms to protect all of God’s people and embrace with tender affection the whole of humanity, especially the poorest, the weakest, the least important, those whom Matthew lists in the final judgment on love: the hungry, the thirsty, the stranger, the naked, the sick and those in prison (cf. Mt 25:31-46). Only those who serve with love are able to protect!

Enhanced by Zemanta
Visualizing Slavery in America

This looks too good to miss.

cover2cmb

Taking inspiration not only from the statement made by Kobena Mercer that, “The art history of the black diaspora is still an ‘undiscovered’ country,” but also by African American artist, Betye Saar, that the “slave ship imprint is on all of us,” this two-day symposium will adopt an international perspective to examine the sculpture, paintings, photography, digital art, mixed-media installations, and performance art produced by artists of African descent on both sides of the Atlantic as they come to grips with visualizing slavery both within America and across the black diaspora. Tracing key transatlantic developments emerging in the late nineteenth century and across the decades of the twentieth century, the purpose of this symposium will be to examine the ways in which black artists engage in an aestheticized politics and politicized aesthetics via experimental, self-reflexive practices as they reject the widespread “whitewashing” (Eddie Chambers) of a black diasporic visual arts tradition. Creating extensive bodies of work which exist in powerful and complex relation to an array of social, political, and historical no less than aesthetic contexts, they debate forceful issues related to transatlantic slavery and its legacies. These include: debates surrounding memorialization and representation; multifaceted reimaginings of otherwise distorted black histories and narratives; black bodies as loci not only of objectification and commodification but of agency and authority; and, cross- cultural examinations of slippery and unfixed identities as characterized by dislocation and displacement in a diasporic imaginary. Working with a range of forms and media, black artists within America and across the diaspora repeatedly transgress formal boundaries in order to visualize slavery and its legacies as they interrogate the politics and poetics of official sites and sights of black memorialization and representation. Challenging the “problem of visuality” (Michele Wallace), theirs is a search for a new visual language as they interrogate diverse ways of “speaking the unspeakable” and “seeing the unseeable.” Committed to challenging dominant modes of representation, therefore, black United States and diasporic artists repeatedly engage in the revisionist recovery of a “multiplicity of histories” (Lubaina Himid). Equally intent upon deconstructing and destabilizing skewed power hierarchies and problematic sexual politics, these artists resist reductive monolithic constructions of racial identities. Instead, they explore the signifying possibilities of multifaceted reimaginings of psychologically complex, mytho-poetic, autobiographical and politicized recreations of selfhood. In compelling ways, an array of black artists reject the widespread dominance of a “filter of a web of white racist images” (Henry Louis Gates, Jr.) as they interrogate white strategies of black stereotyping and caricature.

More at link above.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Google Art Project

Probably the most fun thing on the web right now.

Jonathan Stökl gets what he deserves

News is out, so why not: I couldn’t be prouder of my long-time friend Jon Stökl, who will join the impressive faculty at King’s College, London (KCL).

Jon will begin teaching Hebrew Bible in the autumn alongside Paul Joyce, and will join a team that already includes Aaron Rosen, Joan Taylor, and Andrea Schatz, among many others. I’m also proud because Jon was the very first editor to join Marginalia. I knew from the very first flicker of a thought that it was a publication he would strengthen, and indeed he has proven to be one of the most committed we have. He is constantly thinking of the integration of the digital with the traditional humanities, and I have no doubt he will continue to play a very important role in the future of MRB, especially now that he can team up with Aaron Rosen, who serves on our Advisory Board.

KCL is fortunate to have him. Applause to Paul Joyce and the committee who appointed him.

Enhanced by Zemanta